SITPStructural Intelligence
Transactions · M&A Advisory and Target Assessment

Know before you sign. Keep knowing after.

The target and its group, its market, its dependencies and its integration risk, assessed before signing and through the hold.

The market’s record

Seventy to ninety per cent of acquisitions fail.

Harvard Business Review
Our record

1,078 transactions read across $10.11 trillion, 1984-2025. Verdicts at 99.8%.

From the platform

What the transactions did to value

Every assessed transaction in the governed validation record, by its outcome.

Value compounded585 · 59%
Compounded under a constraint113 · 11%
Value destroyed223 · 22%
Negative27 · 3%
Neutral52 · 5%
1,078 cases, 1984-2025; composed from the governed record at generation Aggregates only. No business is named. Read from the platform, refreshed daily.
What it covers

The target and its group

Every entity resolved, from ultimate parent to operating subsidiary.

Its market and dependencies

Its position against peers, and the vendors it runs on.

Integration and value

Where two structures fit, where they conflict, and what the deal can release.

The questions it answers
Should we buy it?What is it really worth?What does it depend on?How do we integrate it?Is the case still holding?
Questions
How does a structural assessment differ from financial due diligence?

Financial due diligence examines what a business has earned. A structural assessment examines whether it is built to keep earning it.

Do you assess insurance targets?

Yes: insurers, reinsurers, Lloyd’s businesses, brokers and MGAs, and targets in any other industry.

Start with a live demonstration on your own market.
Request a demonstration

← All capabilities